بررسی ساختار عاملی، پایایی و روایی نسخه فارسی مقیاس عدم‌درگیری اخلاقی

نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی

2 استاد، گروه روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی

3 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی

10.22084/j.psychogy.2019.17865.1859

چکیده

هدف: عدم‌درگیری اخلاقی به فرآیندی اطلاق می­شود که با تغییر در درک و فهم اخلاقی خود اعمال غیراخلاقی را توجیه می­کند. هدف از مطالعه حاضر بررسی پایایی، روایی و تعیین ساختار عاملی مقیاس عدم درگیری اخلاقی در جمعیت ایرانی بود.
روش: پژوهش حاصر توصیفی از نوع همبستگی می­باشد. جامعه آماری دانش­آموزان مقطع متوسطه دوم استان لرستان در سال تحصیلی 1398-1397 بود. نمونه آماری 617 دانش­آموز (324 پسر و 293 دختر) که به روش نمونه­گیری خوشه­ای چندمرحله­ای انتخاب و به پرسشنامه پاسخ دادند. داده‌های پژوهش حاضر از طریق مقیاس عدم درگیری اخلاقی (بندورا و همکاران، 1996) گردآوری شد.
یافته­ها: داده­های پژوهش از طریق نرم­افزارهای SPSS 21 و LISREL 8.8 و آزمون همسانی درونی (آلفای کرونباخ)، تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفتند. یافته­های تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که داده­های این پژوهش با یک عامل برازش مطلوبی نشان می­دهند.
نتیجه­گیری: نتایج به‌دست آمده حاکی از این است که مقیاس عدم درگیری اخلاقی از روایی و پایایی مناسبی جهت استفاده در جمعیت ایرانی برخوردار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Study of Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of Persian Version of the Moral Disengagement Scale

نویسندگان [English]

  • hossein souri 1
  • Parvin Kadivar 2
  • hadi keramati 3
  • hamidreza hassanabadi 3
1 Instructor, Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor Kharazmi University - - Kharazmi University
چکیده [English]

Objective: Moral disengagement refers to a process that involves justifying one’s immoral actions by altering one’s moral perception of those actions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability, validity and determination of the factor structure of moral disengagement scale in Iranian population.
Methods: Method of research is descriptive of correlation type. The statistical population of the second high school students was Lorestan province in the year 1398-1397. Sample size of 617 students (324 males and 293 females) who were selected by multi stage cluster sampling and responded to the questionnaire. The data of the present study were collected through a moral disengagement scale (Bandura et al., 1996).
Results: Data were analyzed using SPSS21 and LISREL 8.8 softwares and internal consistency test (Cronbach's alpha), exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The findings of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of the present study showed that the data of this research show a good fitting factor.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the moral disengagement scale has an appropriate validity and reliability for use in the Iranian population.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Moral disengagement
  • factor structure
  • Reliability
  • Validity
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, and states of mind (pp. 161-191). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A. (1995). Multifaceted scale of mechanisms of moral disengagement. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Stanford University, USA.

Bandura, A. (1999). “Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities”. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193-209. Doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3.

Bandura, A. (2002). “Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency”. Journal of moral education, 31(2), 101-119. doi:10.1080/0305724022014322

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). “Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency”. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(2), 364.

Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., & Regalia, C. (2001). “Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior”. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(1), 125-135.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). “Alternative ways of assessing model fit”. Sage focus editions, 154, 136-136.

Carrera-Fernández, M. V., Cid-Fernández, X. M., Almeida, A., González-Fernández, A., & Lameiras-Fernández, M. (2018). Attitudes toward Cultural Diversity in Spanish and Portuguese Adolescents of Secondary Education: The Influence of Heteronormativity and Moral Disengagement in School Bullying. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), 23(1), 17-25.

Ghasemi, v. (2012). “Estimation of optimum sample size in structural equation modeling assessing its adequacy for social researchers”. Iranian journal of sociology (isa), 12(4), 138-161.

Gini, G. (2006). “Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What's wrong?”. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 32(6), 528-539.

Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Bussey, K. (2014). “Collective moral disengagement: Initial validation of a scale for adolescents”. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(3), 386-395.

Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Bussey, K. (2015). “The role of individual and collective moral disengagement in peer aggression and bystanding: A multilevel analysis”. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 43(3), 441-452.

Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M., & Oliveira, A. (2016). “Situating moral disengagement: Motivated reasoning in meat consumption and substitution”. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 353-364.

Hardy, S. A., Bean, D. S., & Olsen, J. A. (2015). “Moral identity and adolescent prosocial and antisocial behaviors: Interactions with moral disengagement and self-regulation”. Journal of youth and adolescence, 44(8), 1542-1554.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Hyatt, J. (2017). “Recognizing Moral Disengagement and Its Impact on Patient Safety”. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 7(4), 15-21.

Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, N., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). “Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents”. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-11.

Johnson, J. F., & Buckley, M. R. (2015). “Multi-level organizational moral disengagement: Directions for future investigation”. Journal of business ethics, 130(2), 291-300.

Kiriakidis, S. P. (2008). “Moral disengagement: Relation to delinquency and independence from indices of social dysfunction”. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 52(5), 571-583.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Klebe Treviño, L., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). “Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior”. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1-48.

Obermann, M. L. (2011). “Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying”. Journal of School Violence, 10(3), 239-257.

Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). “Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies”. Aggressive behavior, 36(2), 81-94.

Pelton, J., Gound, M., Forehand, R., & Brody, G. (2004). “The moral disengagement scale: Extension with an American minority sample”. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 31-39.

Rubio-Garay, F., Amor, P. J., & Carrasco, M. A. (2017). “Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Scale (MMDS-S)”. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 22(1), 43-54.

Tillman, C., Gonzalez, K., Whitman, M. V., Crawford, W. S., & Hood, A. C. (2018). A Multi-Functional View of Moral Disengagement: Exploring the Effects of Learning the Consequences. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2286.

Turner, R. M. (2008). Moral disengagement as a predictor of bullying and aggression: Are there gender differences?. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Wang, C., Ryoo, J. H., Swearer, S. M., Turner, R., & Goldberg, T. S. (2017). “Longitudinal relationships between bullying and moral disengagement among adolescents”. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46(6), 1304-1317.

Wang, X., Lei, L., Liu, D., & Hu, H. (2016). “Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents”. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 244-249.

Wang, X., Lei, L., Yang, J., Gao, L., & Zhao, F. (2017b). “Moral disengagement as mediator and moderator of the relation between empathy and aggression among Chinese male juvenile delinquents”. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(2), 316-326.

Wang, X., Yang, L., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017a). “Trait anger and cyberbullying among young adults: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and moral identity”. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 519-526.

Yang, X., Wang, Z., Huan, C., & Liu, D. (2018). Cyberbullying among Chinese adolescents: The role of interparental conflict, moral disengagement, and moral identity. Children and Youth Services Review.

Zelidman, A. (2014). Empathy as a moderator of adolescent bullying behavior and moral disengagement after controlling for social desirability. Wayne State University Dissertations. 944. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations.