بررسی رابطه بین فعال‌سازی شناختی و راهبردهای شناختی در یادگیری با نقش میانجی خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و هیجان‌های پیشرفت در دانشجویان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد روان‌شناسی تربیتی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی تربیتی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی بالینی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: در عصر حاضر، یکی از دغدغه‌های اصلی نظام‌های آموزشی دستیابی دانشجویان به یادگیری عمیق و معنادار است. در همین راستا، پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه بین فعال‌سازی شناختی و راهبردهای یادگیری شناختی با نقش میانجی‌گری خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و هیجان‌های پیشرفت انجام شد.
روش: پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف بنیادی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری داده­ها، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی و به‌طور خاص از نوع مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه دانشجویان دانشگاه لرستان در سال تحصیلی 1402-1401 به تعداد 4439 نفر بود که به‌صورت تصادفی خوشه‌ای مرحله­ای تعداد 400 نفر به‌عنوان حجم نمونه انتخاب شد. در پژوهش حاضر برای گردآوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه‌های راهبردهای انگیزشی برای یادگیری پینتریچ و همکاران (1991)، فعال‌سازی شناختی فاوث و همکاران (2014)، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی پاتریک و همکاران (1997) و هیجان‌های پیشرفت پکران و همکاران (2005) استفاده شد. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری و استفاده از نرم­افزارهای Spss-26 و Amos-24 انجام گرفت.
یافته‌ها: یافته­های پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که فعال‌سازی شناختی اثر مستقیم و معنی­داری بر راهبردهای شناختی در یادگیری دارد (0.01>P). همچنین، متغیرهای خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و هیجان­های پیشرفت نیز اثر مستقیم و معنی­داری بر راهبردهای شناختی در یادگیری دارند (0.01>P). علاوه بر این، فعال‌سازی شناختی به‌طور غیرمستقیم از طریق خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و هیجان‌های پیشرفت اثر معنی­داری بر راهبردهای شناختی در یادگیری دانشجویان دارد (0.05>P).

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Relationship between Cognitive Activation and Cognitive Learning Strategies with the Mediating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy and Achievement Emotions among Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ezatolah Ghadampour 1
  • Davud Kazemi Fard 2
  • Mahbobeh Golsanamlo 2
  • Mohammad Hataminezhad 3
1 Professor of Educational psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 PhD. Student of Educational psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Lorestan, Khorramabad. Iran
3 PhD Student in Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: In today's era, one of the main concerns of educational systems is students' achievement of deep and meaningful learning. In this regard, this research was conducted with the aim of investigating the relationship between the cognitive activation and cognitive learning strategies with the role of mediating of Academic Self-Efficacy and achievement emotions among students.
Methods: In terms of its fundamental objective and in terms of the data collection method, the present study was a descriptive correlational study, specifically a structural equation modeling study. The statistical population of the study included all students of Lorestan University in the academic year 2022-2023, totaling 4439 people, of whom 400 people were selected as the sample size through a random cluster phased approach. In the present study, the questionnaires of motivational strategies for learning by Pintrich et al. (1991), cognitive activation by Fawth et al. (2014), academic self-efficacy by Patrick et al. (1997), and emotions of achievement by Pekran et al. (2005) were used to collect information. Data analysis was performed using structural equation modeling and using Spss-26 and Amos-24 software.
Results: The findings of the present study showed that cognitive activation has a direct and significant effect on cognitive strategies in learning (P<0.01). Also, the variables of academic self-efficacy and emotions of achievement also have a direct and significant effect on cognitive strategies in learning (P<0.01). In addition, cognitive activation indirectly through academic self-efficacy and emotions of achievement has a significant effect on cognitive strategies in students' learning (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Based on the findings of the present study, it can be concluded that by applying cognitive activation through academic self-efficacy and emotions of achievement in educational environments, cognitive strategies among students' learning can be improved.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cognitive Learning Strategies
  • Cognitive Activation
  • Academic Self-Efficacy
  • Achievement Emotions
Afsharian, N., & Dortaj, F. (2016). Evaluation of the Factor Structure of “Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire” forIranian students. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 6(23), 23-43. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2017.11267.1327     
Ahmed, W., Van der Werf, G., Kuyper, H., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 150-161. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0030160
Anthonysamy, L., & Singh, P. (2023). The impact of satisfaction, and autonomous learning strategies use on scholastic achievement during Covid-19 confinement in Malaysia. Heliyon, 9(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12198
Asikainen, H., Nieminen, J. H., Häsä, J., & Katajavuori, N. (2022). University students’ interest and burnout profiles and their relation to approaches to learning and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 93(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102105
Ateş, H. (2024). Designing a self-regulated flipped learning approach to promote students’ science learning performance. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202401_27(1).RP05
Avishai, A., Brewer, N. T., Mendel, J. R., & Sheeran, P. (2023). Expanding the analysis of mechanisms of action in behavioral interventions: cognitive change versus cognitive activation. Psychology & health, 38(4), 409-428.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1969021
Cantley, I., Prendergast, M., & Schlindwein, F. (2017). Collaborative cognitive-activation strategies as an emancipatory force in promoting girls’ interest in and enjoyment of mathematics: A cross-national case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 81(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.11.004
Chan, T. J., & Dai, M. (2023). Factors influencing academic achievement of university students. Journal of Communication, Language and Culture3(2), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2023
Chatzistamatiou, M., Dermitzaki, I., Efklides, A., & Leondari, A. (2015). Motivational and affective determinants of self-regulatory strategy use in elementary school mathematics. Educational Psychology, 35(7), 835-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.822960
Ekatushabe, M., Kwarikunda, D., Muwonge, C.M., Ssenyonga, J., & Schiefele, U. (2021). Relations between perceived teacher’s autonomy support, cognitive appraisals and boredom in physics learning among lower secondary school students. International Journal of steam Education, 8(8), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00272-5
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school. Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29(1), 1-9. http://doi.org/10. 1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
Gasemi Gheshlagh, M., sepehrianazar, F., & keyhan, J. (2018). The effectiveness of teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies on problem solving, Numerical memory and Mathematics self-efficacy in students. Cognit Strateg Learn, 6(11), 215-232. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.24237906.1397.6.11.11.2
Gruber, N., & Kurahashi-Friedmann, T. (2024). Self-Efficacy, Motivation and Learning Strategies in Germany and Japan. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 11(2), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2024.11.2.1216
Haji-yakhchali, A.R., Haghighi, J., & Shokrkon, H. (2001). A Study of Simple and Multiple Relationships of important Antecedents of Mastery Goal Orientation and Its Relationship with Academic Performance of First Grade Boy Students at Ahvaz High Schools. Psychological Achievements, 8(1), 31-48. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22055/psy.2001.16465
Han, J., & Geng, X. (2023). University students’ approaches to online learning technologies: The roles of perceived support, affect/emotion and self-efficacy in technology-enhanced learning. Computers & Education, 194(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104695
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The Effects of Classroom Mathematics Teaching on Students’ Learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 371-404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Job, A. L., & Muralidharan, S. (2024). Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies of Learning in Higher Education. In Implementing Interactive Learning Strategies in Higher Education (pp. 95-122). IGI Global.
Javadi Elmi, L., Asadzadeh, H., Delavar, A., &  Dortaj, F. (2020). Structural Equation Modeling of Students' academic engagement based on Academic Self-efficacy, transformational teaching with the Mediation Role of Academic Buoyancy. Cognit Strateg Learn, 8(14), 1-19. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22084/j.psychogy.2019.16774.1798
Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom, 8(9), 137-160.
Lazarides, R., & Raufelder, D. (2020). Control-value theory in the context of teaching: Does teaching quality moderate relations between academic self-concept and achievement emotions? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12352
Li, H., Liu, J., Zhang, D., & Liu, H. (2021). Examining the relationships between cognitive activation, self-efficacy, socioeconomic status, and achievement in mathematics: A multi-level analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12351
Liem, A.D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
Liu, S., & Yin, H. (2024). Opening the black box: How professional learning communities, collective teacher efficacy, and cognitive activation affect students’ mathematics achievement in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 139(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104443
Liu, Y., Zhang, S., & Tang, L. (2024). Distributed Cognitive Learning Strategy for Cooperative–Competitive Multiagent Systems. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 16(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2023.3242370
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., Freeman, K. E., Urdan, T. et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Muwonge, C. M., Ssenyonga, J., & Kwarikunda, D. (2018). Cognitive appraisals, achievement emotions, and motivation towards learning mathematics among lower secondary students. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(2), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1487907
Muwonge, C.M., Schiefele, U., Ssenyonga, J., & Kibedi, H. (2019). Modeling the relationship between motivational beliefs, cognitive learning strategies, and academic performance of teacher education students. South African Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246318775547
Ng, B. L., Liu, W. C., & Wang, J. C. (2016). Student motivation and learning in mathematics and science: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 1359-1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9654-1
Obergriesser, S., & Stoeger, H. (2020). Students’ emotions of enjoyment and boredom and their use of cognitive learning strategies how do they affect one another? Learning and Instruction, 66(2), 1-10. 566(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101285
Patrick, H., Hicks, L., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Relations of perceived social efficacy and social goal pursuit to self-efficacy for academic work. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 17(2), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431697017002001
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational psychology review, 18(4), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L.M., Stupnisky, R.H., & Perry, R.P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019243
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED338122
Putwain, W.D., Schmitz, A.E., Wood, P., & Pekrun, R. (2021). The role of achievement emotions in primary school mathematics: Control–value antecedents and achievement outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12367
Reyes, B., Jiménez‐Hernández, D., Martínez‐Gregorio, S., De los Santos, S., Galiana, L., & Tomás, J. M. (2023). Prediction of academic achievement in Dominican students: Mediational role of learning strategies and study habits and attitudes toward study. Psychology in the Schools, 60(3), 606-625. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22780
Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students' prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20203
Saif, A.A. (2019). Modern educational Psychology: Pychology of learning and instruction. Tehran: Doran Press.
Sigurjónsson, J. Ö., Sigurðardóttir, A. K., Gísladóttir, B., & Van Bommel, J. (2022). Connecting Student Perceptions and Classroom Observations as Measures of Cognitive Activation. Nordic Studies in Education, 42(4), 328-346. https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v42.3636
Teig, N., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2019). I know I can, but do I have the time? The role of teachers’ self-efficacy and perceived time constraints in implementing cognitive-activation strategies in science. Frontiers in psychology, 10(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01697
Tze, V.M.C., Daniels, L.M., & Klassen, R.M. (2016). Evaluating the relationship between boredom and academic outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9301-y
Yang, C. C., & Ogata, H. (2023). Personalized learning analytics intervention approach for enhancing student learning achievement and behavioral engagement in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2509-2528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11291-2
You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers & Education, 77(7), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.018
Zhang, D., Wang, C., & Yang, Y. (2021). The association between cognitive activation and mathematics achievement: a multiple mediation model. Educational Psychology, 41(6), 695-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1917520